Iowa court same sex marriage

Most Popular Videos
Contents:
  1. Iowa Court Decision Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage
  2. Celebrating Ten Years of Marriage Equality in Iowa—Yes, Iowa
  3. University of Iowa professor generates millions by taking a semester off
  4. Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region
  5. LAW's Robert Volk sees Northeast states following suit, and soon

Starting on Nov.

Iowa Court Decision Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage

All six were rejected. On Dec. Katherine Varnum of Cedar Rapids had already agreed to give her name to the case as the lead plaintiff. Varnum v. Brien was the first time any state supreme court had ruled unanimously in favor of same-sex marriage. It was also the first time a court had directly addressed the religious objections to same-sex marriage.

This result is what our constitution requires.

Celebrating Ten Years of Marriage Equality in Iowa—Yes, Iowa

The reaction to the Iowa Supreme Court decision in Varnum v. Brien is almost as famous as the decision itself.

And not just in Iowa. It worked.

University of Iowa professor generates millions by taking a semester off

All three lost. Less well-known are the attempts to unseat Judge Neary, who approved the Brown-Perez divorce in His regularly scheduled retention elections happened in and He survived both times, but by lower-than-expected margins. By , however, same-sex marriage was no longer generating much anger in voters. Neary won retention that year with Your email address will not be published. Help us build the greatest small city for the arts in America—right here in Iowa City.

The results are in!

Find Your State

Find out which of your favorite CR and IC haunts took home a prize. A long name for an epic evening yes, evening. Browse latest Issues Issue Opponents of same-sex marriage pledged to fight the outcome, but acknowledged that there appeared to be no immediate way to undo it.

The only avenue would be a constitutional amendment, but under Iowa law that process would take at least two years. Members of the Iowa Family Policy Center, a group opposed to same-sex marriage, spoke with state lawmakers after the ruling in hopes of jump-starting the amendment process.


  • warranty of habitability california rent law.
  • owyhee county jail inmates and warrents;
  • find owner of a vehicle license plate number!
  • saturn used car history - free carfax report.
  • Iowa's ban on same-sex marriage overturned 10 years ago today?

But there was no indication that the Legislature, controlled by Democrats, would take up the matter. Meanwhile, the ruling set off celebrations among same-sex couples, many of whom had gathered at a hotel here to await word.

Chicago Tribune - We are currently unavailable in your region

They wept, embraced, laughed, and wept some more. Twombley said. Same-sex marriages could take place in counties here starting in three weeks, when the ruling becomes final, lawyers said. There is no requirement that people seeking marriage licenses prove they live in Iowa, so the doors will be open to same-sex couples from other states. Johnson, a lawyer from Des Moines who had helped represent the gay and lesbian couples in the case, told the gathering at the hotel.

Opponents of the decision said they believed it would awaken enormous backlash here and throughout the Midwest once people understood what had happened. Along the streets of this city in the hours after the ruling, people expressed mixed views of the matter, though nearly all said they were surprised — happily so, in some cases, but less so for others — at what the court had concluded.

On at least one talk-radio show, residents were enraged. Within hours of the decision, the representatives of the Iowa Family Policy Center left the Supreme Court building here, and sought out state lawmakers in the State Capitol building just down the street.

View all New York Times newsletters. Unlike some states that have barred the marriages with voter-led ballot measures, voters here cannot directly initiate constitutional amendments. Instead, an amendment would require approval by state lawmakers during two legislative sessions, and then approval by voters at the ballot box.

That means the earliest a prospective ban could take effect would be Opponents of same-sex marriages want state lawmakers, who are a few weeks from finishing their annual legislative session, to begin the process now. But the idea seemed to have no backing among legislative leaders; both chambers here are controlled by Democrats. Chet Culver, also a Democrat, was more muted in his response to the ruling.

LAW's Robert Volk sees Northeast states following suit, and soon

Culver said in a written statement. Whether or not state lawmakers take up the constitutional amendment in the coming weeks, the ruling ensures the state will become a battleground over same-sex marriage. National advocacy groups, which have been focused on a case before the California Supreme Court that seeks to overturn the ban in that state, and on Vermont , where a bill legalizing same-sex marriage is pending, have already turned their eyes to Des Moines.

Brown, the executive director of the National Organization for Marriage, a group formed in to preserve traditional marriage.

The Iowa Journal - Web Exclusive - Iowa Constitution and Same-Sex Marriage Ruling